Physician Assisted Suicide and Active Euthanasia

Physician Assisted Suicide and Active EuthanasiaGod gives life to everything (1 Tim. 6.13). Nothing has life, except what God has desired to live. God has allowed us liberty to choose to act in accordance with His word or to act out against it; to act morally or immorally. Physician assisted suicide and active euthanasia are unethical practices since they go against the intent of God for life. There is no reason to take our own lives; God will take them in His time. There are two participants in the process of physician assisted suicide which are faced with their own ethical dilemmas: the physician and the patient, the person considering euthanasia.

Somehow mankind tends to become lenient to the subject of euthanasia. We tend to believe that our lives are our own and we can do what we want with them. This definition does not stand up to biblical standards. Numbers 35.16 says, “If a man strikes someone with an iron object so that he dies, he is a murderer” and Exodus 20:13 says, “You shall not murder.” We are commanded not to murder and to strike someone, even yourself, is murder.

The physician is not committing murder or breaking any other command, at least not directly. That still does not make the practice ethical. The physician is an enabler. According to First Corinthians, chapter eight, if we do anything which leads someone else to sin, then we ourselves are sinning. For this very simple reason, the blood of the murderer (the patient) is on the hands of the physician since he assisted in the murder. Therefore, the physician is just as guilty as the patient, so it is immoral for him to assist in suicide.

There is another fairly obvious dilemma. Even if you do not believe in the Bible, there are characteristics of the scenario which are ‘red flags’. Natural law tells man that murder and even suicide in most cultures is immoral. To argue that a medical or emotional situation warrants the behavior is simply a mask for mans desire to change what God has written on their hearts as sin. Even the physicians role is carefully scripted so as to remain arguably ethical. Most morals are fairly black and white. The more you try to justify a behavior, the more argument you find for its immorality. I believe that is the case with euthanasia and physician assisted suicide, so it should never be practiced under any circumstances.

Image Credits: adamci, sxc.hu

The Apostle Paul’s Instructions on Biblical Church Leading

the-apostle-paule28099s-instructions-on-biblical-church-leading

Mattox, www.sxc.hu/photo/1170830

There are many different denominations of Christianity which all come with variances in practices of worship. This has to do with traditions. Traditions are perfectly acceptable in the church, even if they vary between churches, so long as they do not distract from or contradict the word of God. Regardless of traditions, there is only one way that a church should function. The modern church can only function in the same manner that the early church was directed to operate; however, it is not to operate in practice according to methods uncovered in extra-biblical texts or some other means. It is to operate under the instruction of God according to the words written by the Apostle Paul, namely: the responsibility of the Preacher (and Teacher), the qualifications of church leaders and the importance of orderly worship regardless of cultural revolution.

The Church can only function properly if it has sound teaching. According to Paul, a teacher of the word of God must be “without stain or reproach” (1 Tim. 6.14). This means that his life does not reflect a life of sin, but more than that, he also cannot be able to be accused of sin. For example, a preacher who regularly goes out to bars and clubs, can easily be accused of sin, even if he is somehow able to keep himself from sin in that environment. In order to be above reproach, it is not enough to keep yourself from sin, but you must “flee from these [sinful] things” (1 Tim 6.11). A teacher of the Word must consistently extricate himself from the practices of the culture and completely envelop himself in the Spirit and the word of God. John Piper says this:

We are outcasts. We are aliens and exiles in the world. Our citizenship is in Heaven and we wait with eager expectation for the Lord (Phil. 3:20). You cannot professionalize the love for His appearing without killing it. And it is being killed (2002).

Piper rightly suggests that the culturalization of preachers into the world is to simply make preaching a profession. A preacher is not a man who happens to be a preacher; on the contrary he is a preacher of God’s word who happens to be a man and as such should live as Paul says, “without stain or reproach” (1 Tim. 6.14). Macarthur says that the “man of God” characterized in first Timothy, chapter six (the expositor, the preacher, the teacher) must be “lifted above worldly aims and ambitions, and devoted singularly to God’s word” (2005).

There are very specific instructions listed in First Timothy regarding the qualifications of church leaders. “It is significant that in describing the qualifications for overseers, the apostle Paul focused on the character rather than the function of the elder” (2008). The qualifications, save for one, are all judgments of character, not ability. The overseer or elder must be above reproach, both in the Church and in the community, just as the preacher. Deacons are called to the same standard. The only characteristic required of a leader is specific to the overseer or elder. That is that he must be able to teach. This is not so much that he is required to teach, but that he must have a thorough understanding of God’s word and be able to communicate God’s word so that he can employ God’s word in Church processes. The overlying purpose for these requirements is simple. If one is called to be a leader of Christ’s church, then he must be able to show his ability to employ God’s word in his own life so that he is above reproach, and also he must be able to teach so that he will be able to employ God’s word in the functions of the church so that the church will be above reproach by following the elders’ leading. The prophet Hosea said, “Like people, like priests./I will punish both of them for their ways/and repay them for their deeds” (Hos. 4.9). The people (the church) will follow their leaders and if those leaders are acting outside of God’s word, they will be punished and so will the church that follows their leading. Paul was not concerned with the job or function of the elder, just that whatever his role is in the church, that he be performing that role in accordance with God’s word in order that the will of God would be done through the church.

Paul gives bi-level instructions on worship, instructions on worship and character of worship. In First Corinthians he gives instructions on how to worship: “hymn[s]… instruction… revelation… tongue[s]… interpretation” (1 Cor. 14.26). In First Timothy, Paul gives instructions on the character of worship. Prayer must be made for everyone so “that we may live peaceful and quiet lives in all godliness and holiness” (2.1). We are to worship “without anger or disputing” (2.8). Women should be careful to “dress modestly” so that all can see their “good deeds” because this is “appropriate for women who profess to worship God” (2.9,10). Women should submit to the men for teaching, not because they are incapable of teaching, but simply because God designed it this way (2.11,12). These instructions are the heart in which the process given to the Corinthians should be accomplished. Robert Mohler Jr. writes,

We cannot buy in to the cherished myth of autonomous individualism, and we cannot compromise with a worldview based on the assumption that truth is relative or socially constructed…our first priority is to love God with heart and soul and mind…In the end, the culture will pass away. But our Lord has left us here for a reason—as His people we are to be salt and light in a dying world (2008).

In other words, we cannot compromise God’s standards on worship simply because of cultural influence. For example, in evangelical feminism the idea is that a woman is perfectly capable of ministering God’s word to anyone, including men. Evangelical feminism argues that women were not culturally accepted as leaders in the early days of the church (Grudem, 2006), but due to cultural revolution God’s word can now be compromised because men will actually listen to women. This is a ridiculous assumption. Women were no less capable in the early days of the church than they are now and, in fact, did take on leadership and teaching roles in many ancient religions, including Judaism (See Judges 4.4). God does not disallow women to teach men on grounds of ability, but on grounds of orderly worship. We are to worship God because of our love for Him and therefore submit to His instructions. This culture will pass away and a new one will arise. In the end, all worldly culture will be obsolete. In spite of the culture we are in, we are to be “salt” (a symbol of eternal salvation) and “light” (an illumination of the love of God), to the world, expressing the love of Jesus, the Christ to a dying people (Matt 5.13-16).

In order to adhere to God’s standards of worship and church function, the preacher must be above reproach and constantly saturated with the word of God so that the teaching he brings to the church is the accurate, unadulterated word of God. The elders and overseers must also be above reproach, in all ways applying the word of God to their lives so that the church can take their leading as an example for their own lives and that the church itself can be above reproach, proving Jesus as the messiah and not as a hypocrite. The practices of worship must be dealt with in care so that they are in all ways consistent with the heart and practice according to God’s standards. These things are not optional, a way to better the church, but are by design, the required process for the church. To do anything less is to defy God’s design for the church and His authority over it.

References
Grudem, Wayne (2006). Countering the Claims of Evangelical Feminism. Colorado Springs, Colorado: Multnomah Books.
MacArthur, John (2005). Preaching: How to Preach Biblicall.y Nashville, Tennessee: Thomas Nelson, Inc..
MacArthur, John (2008). The Masters Plan for the Church. Chicago, Illinois: Moody Publishers.
Mohler Jr., R. Albert (2008). Culture Shift. Colorado Springs, Colorado: Multnomah Books.
Piper, John (2002). Brothers We Are Not Professionals. Nashville, Tennessee: Broadman & Holman Publishers

How to be Free from Sin – Righteous

How to be Free from Sin – Righteous
Righteousness is observation of all the Lord’s commandments. Everything that is law for us to do is required to be done in order for us to be righteous. If there is any evil, any sin, in us we are not righteous. Certainly our unrighteousness has been covered over by the blood of Jesus Christ, but we should still desire to do what God has required of us in order to bring Him glory. There are three categories of sin which require very different methods in order to be repentant of them. They are intentional sin, unintentional sin and unknown sin.

“When your son asks you in time to come, saying, ‘What do the testimonies and the statutes and the judgments mean which the LORD our God commanded you?’ then you shall say to your son, ‘We were slaves to Pharaoh in Egypt, and the LORD brought us from Egypt with a mighty hand. ‘Moreover, the LORD showed great and distressing signs and wonders before our eyes against Egypt, Pharaoh and all his household; He brought us out from there in order to bring us in, to give us the land which He had sworn to our fathers.’ “So the LORD commanded us to observe all these statutes, to fear the LORD our God for our good always and for our survival, as it is today. “It will be righteousness for us if we are careful to observe all this commandment before the LORD our God, just as He commanded us.

Deuteronomy 6:20-25 NAS

In simplest form, this passage from Deuteronomy tells us that we are to remember that once we were slaves, but through many trials, God delivered us from sin into holiness. For the Israelites that was a literal deliverance from slavery, but for Christians today, it is a deliverance from the slavery of sin. We are no longer subject to the control of sin and are free now to observe all the commandments of the Lord, just as the Israelites were free to observe them once they reached the Holy Land. The passage is clear that in either case we will be righteous of we observe the commands of the Lord God.

Observing the commands of God is a daunting task. There are so many! How can we know them and how can we obey them? Broken down categorically it makes more sense.

  • Intentional Sin. “If I regard wickedness in my heart, The Lord will not hear” (Psalms 66:18 NAS). To regard is to observe closely or attentively. If you attend to evil in your heart, you are not yet free from the bondage of sin. You must choose Christ and give over all sin to him; you will be forgiven. This step is really the easiest for most. With Christ comes a desire to do right and so avoiding sinful actions of this nature are easily avoided.
  • Unknown Sin. This is a trap for many Christians. “If I don’t know it is sin, it isn’t sin.” Wrong! If there is unknown sin, then there is a lack in the knowledge and wisdom of God. “All Scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness” (1 Timothy 3:16 NAS). If there is unknown sin, it is because you have not been trained in righteousness. How do we become trained in righteousness? Scripture. As Christians we are accountable for all of our sin. If we are to rid ourselves of sin, we must know sin and must be trained to be rid of it. Through careful study of the Word of God we can become aware of sin, trained in righteousness, so we can be repentant of this sin.
  • Unintentional Sin. “Thus you shall do on the seventh day of the month [put blood from the sin offering on the doorposts] for everyone who goes astray or is naive; so you shall make atonement for the house” (Ezekiel 45:20 NAS). To an extent everyone is naïve to sin in some form or another. The naïve will go astray if they are led too close to sin. A good example is lust. A man may be fully aware that lust is a sin and make a conscious effort not to lust in his mind, but if he finds himself in situations which become a temptation to lust, he is likely to fail. So, the solution is to not be hasty in action, instead exhibit patience in all action, considering carefully the words of God so that we will not be led into temptation and be subject to our naïve nature which will cause sin.
  • This is not all to say that if one sins he is not a Christian. “There is none righteous, not even one” (Romans 3:10 NAS). No one is going to be completely sinless, but we are free from the slavery of sin through Christ’s sacrifice on the cross. Still we are all called to be set apart from sin and if we truly believe the words of God, and regard Holiness in our hearts, then freedom from sin is a feasible goal, even if we are not likely to obtain it of our own power.

    The Integrity of Modesty

    Today modesty seems like such a general term. Every congregation across the planet seems to have a different perspective on what it means to be, or in this case dress, modestly and discretely. Some are content with no less than full head to toe coverage at all times where others will be as liberal as to wear string bikinis in public. Further, we will look to the Greek as well as to the English language in order to narrow the margin in defining biblical modesty and discretion.

    Likewise, I want women to adorn themselves with proper clothing, modestly and discreetly, not with braided hair and gold or pearls or costly garments, but rather by means of good works, as is proper for women making a claim to godliness.
    (1 Timothy 2:9, 10)

    Let’s start with the Greek.

    The word for modesty used in 1 Timothy is {ahee-doce’}. It means a shame or honor, modesty, reverence, respect or regard for others.

    It’s obvious that it can mean modest as that is the word chosen by most translators for this verse, but this is an area where we can get a better understanding on the intent by studying the alternate implications of the word. For instance shame or honor.

    …adorn themselves with proper clothing, with shame or honor…

    This seems odd, but what it means is that the word goes either way. It’s saying that the subject, the clothing, can bring either shame or honor to the person wearing it. So will the clothing bring shame or honor? Well that all depends on the rest of the definition. What will bring reverence, respect or regard for others? The implication is that you are to conform to your surroundings. If there is a tradition of full coverage then that is how to dress modestly. Whether the tradition of dress is liberal or conservative, there are questions which should be asked in order to know if your dress is modest.

    Will my attire…

    …cause men to lust?
    …cause women to envy?
    …cause anyone to become prideful because of me?

    The idea is that you will dress in a way that will prevent anyone from sinning because of you.

    Now let’s look at the English language and how modesty is used. If I host a dinner party and more guests show up than expected, I may dish up modest proportions in order to make sure everyone can eat. In this case, modest means smaller, but has the connotation that it is still enough. So if I am concerned about what I am wearing, it should be enough, but not more than is required. This applies, as the passage states, to hair, jewelry and the wealthy appearance of the cloth itself.

    Men, don’t think you are off the hook. This tends to be a problem for women, but it can be for men as well. Consider your attitude when you dress. Do you attempt to show off muscles in order to impress others? If you cause them to envy, then you have caused them to stumble into sin.

    There is an additional application as well. In context, this is talking about modesty in worship service, however this closer analysis shows that the intent is to prevent others from sinful thoughts in order to focus on worship. Should we provoke others to sin outside of worship? Certainly we should not, so the concept of modesty can be applied to all aspects of life, attire, the car we drive, attitudes, to name a few.

    Analysis of 1 Corinthians 14: 34, 35

    1 Corinthians 14: 34, 35
    “Women should remain silent in the churches. They are not allowed to speak, but must be in submission, as the Law says. If they want to inquire about something, they should ask their own husbands at home; for it is disgraceful for a woman to speak in the church.”

    The concern is that we would take the text out of context. (more…)